MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13218719.2017.1315764

Медицинская библиотека · Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2017

The Development of a Conceptual Model of Perceived Victim Credibility in Child Sexual Assault Cases.

Voogt Ashmyra, Klettke Bianca, Thomson Donald

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Perceived victim credibility is a crucial factor in jury decision-making, especially in the context of child sexual assault cases where there are often no corroborating witnesses. Yet despite the importance of credibility and the expanding research in this area, there remains no unified understanding of what credibility is, what domains it encompasses and how it can be comprehensively measured. This article proposes a conceptual model of perceived victim credibility encompassing the five domains of accuracy, believability, competency, reliability and truthfulness. These domains are defined, distinguishing between the various sub-constructs based on the items they encompass. This model provides a theoretical framework for the development of an instrument to measure perceived victim credibility in future research studies. This is valuable for both researchers and professionals working in the area of child sexual assault in terms of understanding the construct of credibility and unifying the approach to measuring and comparing attitudes.

Для цитирования: Voogt Ashmyra, Klettke Bianca, Thomson Donald. The Development of a Conceptual Model of Perceived Victim Credibility in Child Sexual Assault Cases.. Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1315764.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.