MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.030

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2018

High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Yang Yafan, Wang Guiying, He Jingli, Zhang Jianfeng, Xi Jinchuan, Wang Feifei

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer surgery includes "high tie" and "low tie"of the inferior mesenteric artery(IMA). However, different ligation level is closely related to the blood supply of anastomosis, which may increase the leakage rate, and it is unclear which technique confers a lower anastomotic leakage rate(AL) and survival advantage.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and impact of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) high ligation versus IMA low ligation on anastomotic leakage, lymph nodes yield rates and 5-year survival.

METHODS

A list of these studies, published in English from 1990 to 2017, was obtained independently by two reviewers from databases such as PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect and Web of Science. Anastomotic leakage rate, the yield of lymph nodes and 5-year survival were compared using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage, number of lymph nodes retrieved and 5-year survival rate for both techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the high tie nor the low tie strategy has an evidence in terms of anastomotic leakage rate, harvested lymph nodes, and the 5-year survival rate. Further RCT is needed.

Для цитирования: Yang Yafan, Wang Guiying, He Jingli, Zhang Jianfeng, Xi Jinchuan, Wang Feifei. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.030.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.