Conformity to the surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines among physicians in a general intensive care unit in Nairobi.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
There are emerging therapies for managing septic critically-ill patients. There is little data from the developing world on their usage.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the conformity rate for resuscitation and management bundles for septic patients amongst physicians in a general intensive care unit.
DESIGN
Cross sectional observational study.
SETTING
The general intensive care unit, Aga Khan University Hospital,Nairobi.
SUBJECTS: Admitting physicians from all specialties in the general intensive care unit.
RESULTS
The physicians had high conformity rates of 92% and 96% for the fluid resuscitation and use of va so pressors respectively for the initial resuscitation bundle. They had moderate conformity rates for blood cultures prior to administering antibiotics (57%) and administration of antibiotics within first hour of recognition of septic shock (54%). There was high conformity rate to the glucose control policy (81%), use of protective lung strategy in acute lung injury/Acute respiratory distress syndrome, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (100%) and stress ulcer prophylaxis (100%) in the management bundle. Conformity was moderate for use of sedation, analgesia and muscle relaxant policy (69%), continuous renal replacement therapies (54%) and low for steroid policy (35%), administration ofdrotrecogin alfa (0%) and selective digestive decontamination (15%).
CONCLUSION
There is varying conformity to the international sepsis guidelines among physicians caring for patients in our general ICU. Since increased conformity would improve survival and reduce morbidity, there is need for sustained education and guideline based performance improvement.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.