MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa050085

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2005

Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation.

Vincenti Flavio, Larsen Christian, Durrbach Antoine, Wekerle Thomas, Nashan Björn, Blancho Gilles, Lang Philippe, Grinyo Josep, Halloran Philip F, Solez Kim, Hagerty David, Levy Elliott, Zhou Wenjiong, Natarajan Kannan, Charpentier Bernard, Belatacept Study Group

Клиническое исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is the standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors yields excellent one-year survival, it is associated over the long term with high rates of death and graft loss, owing in part to the adverse renal, cardiovascular, and metabolic effects of these agents. The use of potentially less toxic agents, such as belatacept, a selective blocker of T-cell activation, may improve outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned renal-transplant recipients to receive an intensive or a less-intensive regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of belatacept over cyclosporine in the incidence of acute rejection at six months (with an upper bound of the 95 percent confidence interval around the treatment difference of less than 20 percent).

RESULTS

At six months, the incidence of acute rejection was similar among the groups: 7 percent for intensive belatacept, 6 percent for less-intensive belatacept, and 8 percent for cyclosporine. At 12 months, the glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher with both intensive and less-intensive belatacept than it was with cyclosporine (66.3, 62.1, and 53.5 ml per minute per 1.73 m2, respectively), and chronic allograft nephropathy was less common with both regimens of belatacept than with cyclosporine (29 percent, 20 percent, and 44 percent, respectively). Lipid levels and blood-pressure values were similar or slightly lower in the belatacept groups, despite the greater use of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications in the cyclosporine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept, an investigational selective costimulation blocker, did not appear to be inferior to cyclosporine as a means of preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation. Belatacept may preserve the glomerular filtration rate and reduce the rate of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Для цитирования: Vincenti Flavio, Larsen Christian, Durrbach Antoine, Wekerle Thomas, Nashan Björn, Blancho Gilles, Lang Philippe, Grinyo Josep, Halloran Philip F, Solez Kim, Hagerty David, Levy Elliott, Zhou Wenjiong, Natarajan Kannan, Charpentier Bernard, Belatacept Study Group. Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation.. The New England journal of medicine. 2005. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa050085.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.