La Tunisie medicale · 2017
Prognostic factors in rectal cancer: where is the evidence?
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khalfallah Mehdi, Dougaz Wejih, Jerraya Hichem, Nouira Ramzi, Bouasker Ibtissem, Dziri Chadli
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In rectal cancer, the 5 years survival is about 53 % for all stages: it remains low in spite of the progress of diagnostic and therapeutic tools. The aim of this work was to provide evidence based answers to the following question: what are the pre, intra and post operative prognostic factors in rectal cancer?
METHODS: We have carried out a search in the following data bases: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus. The key words used were: « rectal cancer », « adenocarcinoma », « overall survival », « disease-free survival », « prognosis » and « evidence-based medicine ». The overall 5 years survival rate has been retained as primary outcome measure. Recurrence-free survival has been retained as secondary endpoint. Were included meta-analyses and systematic reviews of clinical trials dating back to less than six years.
RESULTS: We retrieved 270 publications, 27 articles only met the above-mentioned eligibility criteria and thereof have been retained in this work. A high operating volume, a specialized surgeon in colorectal surgery, a total mesorectal excision, an adjuvant chemotherapy given within no more than 8 weeks following the curative resection improve prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. Anastomotic leak and diabetes worsen prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. Margin of surgical resection must be RO to improve prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence.
CONCLUSION: The main prognostic factors found in literature which we should keep in mind are those on which surgeons can act: neoadjuvant treatment, high operating volume of the surgeon, high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery, mesorectal excision , RO resection, improvement of the techniques of intersphincteric resection and techniques of anastomosis and adjuvant chemotherapy within less than 8 weeks when appropriate.
METHODS: We have carried out a search in the following data bases: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus. The key words used were: « rectal cancer », « adenocarcinoma », « overall survival », « disease-free survival », « prognosis » and « evidence-based medicine ». The overall 5 years survival rate has been retained as primary outcome measure. Recurrence-free survival has been retained as secondary endpoint. Were included meta-analyses and systematic reviews of clinical trials dating back to less than six years.
RESULTS: We retrieved 270 publications, 27 articles only met the above-mentioned eligibility criteria and thereof have been retained in this work. A high operating volume, a specialized surgeon in colorectal surgery, a total mesorectal excision, an adjuvant chemotherapy given within no more than 8 weeks following the curative resection improve prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. Anastomotic leak and diabetes worsen prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. Margin of surgical resection must be RO to improve prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence.
CONCLUSION: The main prognostic factors found in literature which we should keep in mind are those on which surgeons can act: neoadjuvant treatment, high operating volume of the surgeon, high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery, mesorectal excision , RO resection, improvement of the techniques of intersphincteric resection and techniques of anastomosis and adjuvant chemotherapy within less than 8 weeks when appropriate.