HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016
Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy is more prevalent with pancreaticogastrostomy than with pancreaticojejunostomy. A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roeyen Geert, Jansen Miet, Ruyssinck Laure, Chapelle Thiery, Vanlander Aude, Bracke Bart, Hartman Vera, Ysebaert Dirk, Berrevoet Frederik
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Recently, pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) has attracted renewed interest as a reconstruction technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), as it may imply a lower risk of clinical pancreatic fistula than reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). We hypothesise that pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is more common during clinical follow-up after PG than it is after PJ.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compares the prevalence of PEI in patients undergoing PD for malignancy with reconstruction by PG versus reconstruction by PJ. PEI during the first year of follow-up was defined as the intake of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) within one year postoperatively and/or an abnormal exocrine function test.
RESULTS: A total of 186 patients, having undergone surgery at two university hospitals, were included in the study. PEI during the first year postoperatively was present in 75.0% of the patients with PG, compared to 45.7% with PJ (p < 0.001). Intake of PERT within one year after surgery was found to be more prevalent in the PG group, i.e. 75.8% versus 38.5% (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards more disturbed exocrine function tests after PG (p = 0.061).
CONCLUSIONS: PEI is more common with PG reconstruction than with PJ reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compares the prevalence of PEI in patients undergoing PD for malignancy with reconstruction by PG versus reconstruction by PJ. PEI during the first year of follow-up was defined as the intake of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) within one year postoperatively and/or an abnormal exocrine function test.
RESULTS: A total of 186 patients, having undergone surgery at two university hospitals, were included in the study. PEI during the first year postoperatively was present in 75.0% of the patients with PG, compared to 45.7% with PJ (p < 0.001). Intake of PERT within one year after surgery was found to be more prevalent in the PG group, i.e. 75.8% versus 38.5% (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards more disturbed exocrine function tests after PG (p = 0.061).
CONCLUSIONS: PEI is more common with PG reconstruction than with PJ reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy.