MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007473

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2015

Lung protective ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery: a systematic review incorporating a Bayesian approach.

Zhang Zhongheng, Hu Xiaoyun, Zhang Xia, Zhu Xiuqi, Chen Liqian, Zhu Li, Hu Caibao, Du Bin, China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG)

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Protective ventilation (PV) has been validated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, the effect of PV in patients undergoing major surgery is controversial. The study aimed to explore the beneficial effect of PV on patients undergoing a major operation by systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Various levels of medical centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS: PV with low tidal volume.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Study end points included acute lung injury (ALI), pneumonia, atelectasis, mortality, length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO and EMBASE were searched from inception to May 2015. Search strategies consisted of terms related to PV and anaesthesia. We reported OR for binary outcomes including ALI, mortality, pneumonia, atelectasis and other adverse outcomes. Weighted mean difference was reported for continuous outcomes such as LOS in the ICU and hospital, pH value, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, oxygenation and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV).

MAIN

RESULTS

A total of 22 citations were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. PV had protective effect against the development of ALI as compared with the control group, with an OR of 0.41 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.87). PV tended to be beneficial with regard to the development of pneumonia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.28) and atelectasis (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.01), but statistical significance was not reached. Other adverse outcomes such as new onset arrhythmia were significantly reduced with the use of PV (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that PV can reduce the risk of ALI in patients undergoing major surgery. However, there is insufficient evidence that such a beneficial effect can be translated to more clinically relevant outcomes such as mortality or duration of MV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered in PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) under registration number CRD42013006416.

Для цитирования: Zhang Zhongheng, Hu Xiaoyun, Zhang Xia, Zhu Xiuqi, Chen Liqian, Zhu Li, Hu Caibao, Du Bin, China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG). Lung protective ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery: a systematic review incorporating a Bayesian approach.. BMJ open. 2015. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007473.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.