Frontiers in immunology · 2025
Deep exploration of the TCR CDR3β repertoire specific for viral CD4 T-cell epitopes inside the circulating T-cell repertoire.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lhomme Gautier, Giraudet Rémi, Porcheddu Valéria, Correia Evelyne, Olaso Robert, Hua Stephane, Maillere Bernard
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study provides an in-depth analysis of the diversity of the CD4 TCR CDR3β repertoire specific to influenza A (HA) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBNA) epitopes.
METHODS: Epitope-specific CD4 T cells from 13 healthy donors were enriched using a short-term culture step, isolated based on activation markers, and sequenced for their TCR CDR3β region using high-throughput sequencing. The frequency of each clonotype was then identified within the complete circulating CD4 T-cell CDR3β repertoire.
RESULTS: For both epitopes, the clonotype distribution was markedly skewed, with a small number of highly expanded clones comprising approximately 60% of the repertoire, alongside numerous low-frequency clonotypes. VJ gene usage and motif preferences differed between the two peptides, highlighting epitope-specific TCR selectivity. The response was predominantly composed of private T-cell clonotypes. The proportion of public clonotypes can increase among donors sharing HLA class II molecules and reveals in HLA-unrelated donors the level of TCR promiscuity.
DISCUSSION: Overall, our data demonstrate that CD4 T-cell responses to these viral epitopes are polyclonal and highly personalized. The modest overlap of clonotypes between donors, coupled with a long tail of low-frequency clones, suggests that the full diversity of the epitope-specific T-cell repertoire is likely broader than previously estimated.
METHODS: Epitope-specific CD4 T cells from 13 healthy donors were enriched using a short-term culture step, isolated based on activation markers, and sequenced for their TCR CDR3β region using high-throughput sequencing. The frequency of each clonotype was then identified within the complete circulating CD4 T-cell CDR3β repertoire.
RESULTS: For both epitopes, the clonotype distribution was markedly skewed, with a small number of highly expanded clones comprising approximately 60% of the repertoire, alongside numerous low-frequency clonotypes. VJ gene usage and motif preferences differed between the two peptides, highlighting epitope-specific TCR selectivity. The response was predominantly composed of private T-cell clonotypes. The proportion of public clonotypes can increase among donors sharing HLA class II molecules and reveals in HLA-unrelated donors the level of TCR promiscuity.
DISCUSSION: Overall, our data demonstrate that CD4 T-cell responses to these viral epitopes are polyclonal and highly personalized. The modest overlap of clonotypes between donors, coupled with a long tail of low-frequency clones, suggests that the full diversity of the epitope-specific T-cell repertoire is likely broader than previously estimated.