Parallel in-depth analysis of repeat expansions in ataxia patients by long-read sequencing.
Аннотация
Instability of simple DNA repeats has been known as a common cause of hereditary ataxias for over 20 years. Routine genetic diagnostics of these phenotypically similar diseases still rely on an iterative workflow for quantification of repeat units by PCR-based methods of limited precision. We established and validated clinical nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing, an amplification-free method for simultaneous analysis of 10 repeat loci associated with clinically overlapping hereditary ataxias. The method combines target enrichment by CRISPR-Cas9, Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing and a bioinformatics pipeline using the tools STRique and Megalodon for parallel detection of length, sequence, methylation and composition of the repeat loci. Clinical nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing allowed for the precise and parallel analysis of 10 repeat loci associated with adult-onset ataxia and revealed additional parameter such as FMR1 promotor methylation and repeat sequence required for diagnosis at the same time. Using clinical nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing we analysed 100 clinical samples of undiagnosed ataxia patients and identified causative repeat expansions in 28 patients. Parallel repeat analysis enabled a molecular diagnosis of ataxias independent of preconceptions on the basis of clinical presentation. Biallelic expansions within RFC1 were identified as the most frequent cause of ataxia. We characterized the RFC1 repeat composition of all patients and identified a novel repeat motif, AGGGG. Our results highlight the power of clinical nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing as a readily expandable workflow for the in-depth analysis and diagnosis of phenotypically overlapping repeat expansion disorders.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.