The American journal of gastroenterology · 2004
Clinical impact of upper endoscopy in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wo John M, Mendez Christian, Harrell Steve, Joubran Rauol, Bressoud Phillip F, McKinney William Paul
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) is frequently performed in patients with heartburn. However, the benefit of an EGD is unclear. The objective is to determine the clinical impact of performing an EGD in the management of GERD.
METHODS: Patients with alarm symptoms or persistent heartburn from primary care and gastroenterology clinics were invited to participate. Patients with known reflux complications or an EGD procedure within 3 yr were excluded. Endpoints for EGD-improving management were prospectively defined: change in medical therapy, dilating esophageal stricture, identifying Barrett's esophagus (BE), finding severe esophagitis (Hetzel-Dent grade 3 or 4), or finding cancer.
RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients (59 M/147 F; median age, 48 yr) were enrolled, in which, 124 had alarm symptoms and 82 had persistent heartburn. EGD improved the overall management in 40% of patients with alarm symptoms and 29% with persistent heartburn (p= NS). Medical therapy was altered in only 5% of patients, and no cancer was identified. EGD was more likely to improve management in males with alarm symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: It was uncommon for an EGD to alter antireflux therapy. The management was improved in approximately one-third of the patients by dilating esophageal stricture, finding BE to initiate surveillance, or finding severe esophagitis. EGD should be performed when alarm symptoms are present, especially in males.
METHODS: Patients with alarm symptoms or persistent heartburn from primary care and gastroenterology clinics were invited to participate. Patients with known reflux complications or an EGD procedure within 3 yr were excluded. Endpoints for EGD-improving management were prospectively defined: change in medical therapy, dilating esophageal stricture, identifying Barrett's esophagus (BE), finding severe esophagitis (Hetzel-Dent grade 3 or 4), or finding cancer.
RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients (59 M/147 F; median age, 48 yr) were enrolled, in which, 124 had alarm symptoms and 82 had persistent heartburn. EGD improved the overall management in 40% of patients with alarm symptoms and 29% with persistent heartburn (p= NS). Medical therapy was altered in only 5% of patients, and no cancer was identified. EGD was more likely to improve management in males with alarm symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: It was uncommon for an EGD to alter antireflux therapy. The management was improved in approximately one-third of the patients by dilating esophageal stricture, finding BE to initiate surveillance, or finding severe esophagitis. EGD should be performed when alarm symptoms are present, especially in males.