MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10147-024-02499-y

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of clinical oncology · 2024

Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

Ozaki Yukinori, Yokoe Takamichi, Yoshinami Tetsuhiro, Nozawa Kazuki, Nishio Hiroshi, Tsuchihashi Kenji, Ichihara Eiki, Miura Yuji, Endo Makoto, Yano Shingo, Maruyama Dai, Susumu Nobuyuki, Takekuma Munetaka, Motohashi Takashi, Ito Mamoru, Baba Eishi, Ochi Nobuaki, Kubo Toshio, Uchino Keita, Kimura Takahiro, Kamiyama Yutaro, Nakao Shinji, Tamura Shinobu, Nishimoto Hitomi, Kato Yasuhisa, Sato Atsushi, Takano Toshimi

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The timing of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration during cancer chemotherapy varies, with Day 2 and Days 3-5 being the most common schedules. Optimal timing remains uncertain, affecting efficacy and adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the available evidence on the timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF administration.

METHODS

Based on the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, we searched the PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Library databases for literature published from January 1990 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria included studies among the adult population using pegfilgrastim. The search strategy focused on timing-related keywords. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data.

RESULTS

Among 300 initial search results, only four articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis for febrile neutropenia incidence suggested a potential higher incidence when pegylated G-CSF was administered on Days 3-5 than on Day 2 (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.46, p = 0.47), with a moderate certainty of evidence. No significant difference in overall survival or mortality due to infections was observed. The trend of severe adverse events was lower on Days 3-5, without statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-3.67, p = 0.69) and with a moderate certainty of evidence. Data on pain were inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Day 2 and Days 3-5 were weakly recommended for pegylated G-CSF administration post-chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The limited evidence highlights the need for further research to refine recommendations.

Для цитирования: Ozaki Yukinori, Yokoe Takamichi, Yoshinami Tetsuhiro, Nozawa Kazuki, Nishio Hiroshi, Tsuchihashi Kenji, Ichihara Eiki, Miura Yuji, Endo Makoto, Yano Shingo, Maruyama Dai, Susumu Nobuyuki, Takekuma Munetaka, Motohashi Takashi, Ito Mamoru, Baba Eishi, Ochi Nobuaki, Kubo Toshio, Uchino Keita, Kimura Takahiro, Kamiyama Yutaro, Nakao Shinji, Tamura Shinobu, Nishimoto Hitomi, Kato Yasuhisa, Sato Atsushi, Takano Toshimi. Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.. International journal of clinical oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02499-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.