Resuscitation · 2010
Impaired recovery of cardiac output and mean arterial pressure after successful defibrillation in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Skhirtladze Keso, Mora Bruno, Moritz Andrea, Birkenberg Beatrice, Ankersmit Hendrik Jan, Dworschak Martin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Early defibrillation clearly improves survival from malignant arrhythmia. However, in some cases the cause of death will only be altered from arrhythmic to nonarrhythmic. We evaluated the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on trend and recovery profile of beat-to-beat cardiac output (CO) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) after successful defibrillation.
METHODS: We investigated 63 NYHA class I-III patients undergoing threshold testing in the course of insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in monitored anaesthesia care. Preoperatively, LVEF was classified as either normal (>50%), moderately (30-50%) or severely impaired (<30%). CO and MAP were measured continuously throughout the implantation procedure.
RESULTS: Arrest time and body mass index were not different between groups. CO in patients with severely and moderately reduced LVEF dropped 21% and 13% below baseline (P<0.05), respectively. MAP also decreased by 26% and 17%, respectively. In contrast, 45% of patients with LVEF>50% showed sympathetic activation that resulted in a 12% and 2% increase in mean values for CO and MAP, respectively. In relation to patients with LVEF<50%, CO and MAP values were significantly higher after defibrillation (P<0.05). Additionally, recovery of CO was prolonged in the groups with ventricular dysfunction (P<0.05). Temporary post-shock pacing was observed in 40% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A large number of ICD patients with restricted LVEF appears to lack the ability to quickly restore CO and MAP after successful defibrillation. Organ reperfusion may thus still be compromised.
METHODS: We investigated 63 NYHA class I-III patients undergoing threshold testing in the course of insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in monitored anaesthesia care. Preoperatively, LVEF was classified as either normal (>50%), moderately (30-50%) or severely impaired (<30%). CO and MAP were measured continuously throughout the implantation procedure.
RESULTS: Arrest time and body mass index were not different between groups. CO in patients with severely and moderately reduced LVEF dropped 21% and 13% below baseline (P<0.05), respectively. MAP also decreased by 26% and 17%, respectively. In contrast, 45% of patients with LVEF>50% showed sympathetic activation that resulted in a 12% and 2% increase in mean values for CO and MAP, respectively. In relation to patients with LVEF<50%, CO and MAP values were significantly higher after defibrillation (P<0.05). Additionally, recovery of CO was prolonged in the groups with ventricular dysfunction (P<0.05). Temporary post-shock pacing was observed in 40% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A large number of ICD patients with restricted LVEF appears to lack the ability to quickly restore CO and MAP after successful defibrillation. Organ reperfusion may thus still be compromised.