The application of clinical genetics · 2024
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Could Not Improve Cumulative Live Birth Rate Among 705 Couples with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Yang, Lan Xiangxin, Lu Juanjuan, Zhang Qian, Zhou Tingting, Ni Tianxiang, Yan Junhao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We evaluate whether next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the cumulative pregnancy outcomes of patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) as compared to conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study (2015-2022). A total of 705 couples diagnosed with uRIF were included in the study. 229 women transferred blastocysts based on morphological grading (IVF/ICSI) and 476 couples opted for PGT-A to screen blastocysts by NGS. Women were further stratified according to age at retrieval (<38 years and ≥38 years). The primary outcome was the cumulative live-birth rate after all the embryos were transferred in a single oocyte retrieval or until achieving a live birth. Confounders were adjusted using binary logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Cumulative live-birth rate was similar between the IVF/ICSI group and the PGT-A group after stratified by age: IVF/ICSI vs PGT-A in the <38 years subgroup (49.7% vs 57.7%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (0.84-1.84), P = 0.270) and in the ≥38 years subgroup (14.0% vs 19.5%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.41-2.92), P = 0.866), respectively. Nonetheless, the PGT group had a lower first-time biochemical pregnancy loss rate (17.0% vs 8.7%, P = 0.034) and a higher cumulative good birth outcome rate (35.2% vs 46.4%, P = 0.014) than the IVF/ICSI group in the <38 years subgroup. Other pregnancy outcomes after the initial embryo transfer and multiple transfers following a single oocyte retrieval were all similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: Our results showed no evidence of favorable effects of PGT-A treatment on improving the cumulative live birth rate in uRIF couples regardless of maternal age. Use of PGT-A in the <38 years uRIF patients would help to decrease the first-time biochemical pregnancy loss and increase the cumulative good birth outcome.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study (2015-2022). A total of 705 couples diagnosed with uRIF were included in the study. 229 women transferred blastocysts based on morphological grading (IVF/ICSI) and 476 couples opted for PGT-A to screen blastocysts by NGS. Women were further stratified according to age at retrieval (<38 years and ≥38 years). The primary outcome was the cumulative live-birth rate after all the embryos were transferred in a single oocyte retrieval or until achieving a live birth. Confounders were adjusted using binary logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Cumulative live-birth rate was similar between the IVF/ICSI group and the PGT-A group after stratified by age: IVF/ICSI vs PGT-A in the <38 years subgroup (49.7% vs 57.7%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (0.84-1.84), P = 0.270) and in the ≥38 years subgroup (14.0% vs 19.5%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.41-2.92), P = 0.866), respectively. Nonetheless, the PGT group had a lower first-time biochemical pregnancy loss rate (17.0% vs 8.7%, P = 0.034) and a higher cumulative good birth outcome rate (35.2% vs 46.4%, P = 0.014) than the IVF/ICSI group in the <38 years subgroup. Other pregnancy outcomes after the initial embryo transfer and multiple transfers following a single oocyte retrieval were all similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: Our results showed no evidence of favorable effects of PGT-A treatment on improving the cumulative live birth rate in uRIF couples regardless of maternal age. Use of PGT-A in the <38 years uRIF patients would help to decrease the first-time biochemical pregnancy loss and increase the cumulative good birth outcome.