MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jar.12334

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2017

Experiences of going to court: Witnesses with intellectual disabilities and their carers speak up.

Beckene Tessy, Forrester-Jones Rachel, Murphy Glynis H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

People with intellectual disabilities are more vulnerable to sexual abuse and are more disadvantaged in the criminal justice system than the general population. However, little is known about the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities who have allegedly been victims of sexual abuse and also been witnesses in court.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This study used semi-structured interviews and a Grounded Theory approach to examine the experiences of four people with intellectual disabilities and four carers/supporters who had all attended trials.

RESULTS

Findings showed that after the traumatic incident of abuse, a court experience could become a secondary source of trauma. Experience of this trauma was dependent on the quality and quantity of support people received and the understanding of intellectual disabilities amongst the legal participants.

CONCLUSION

The findings argue for better training for legal participants who are in contact with vulnerable witnesses and better support structures for alleged victims.

Для цитирования: Beckene Tessy, Forrester-Jones Rachel, Murphy Glynis H. Experiences of going to court: Witnesses with intellectual disabilities and their carers speak up.. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID. 2017. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12334.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.