Comparative study of cardiac autonomic status by heart rate variability between under-treatment normotensive and hypertensive known type 2 diabetics.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Co-existence of hypertension is known in three quarter of Indian type 2 diabetics, this duo having adverse additive effect on cardiovascular health including dysautonomia. Latter can be measured by simple 5min heart rate variability (HRV) using simple electrocardiogram, which if reduced indicates cardiac risk.
OBJECTIVE
We compared HRV parameters between hypertensive and normotensive type 2 diabetics, looking for significant difference if any.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
98 hypertensive and 40 normotensive type 2 diabetics treated as outpatients were evaluated for disease control and risk stratification. Fivemin resting HRV was measured by Variowin HR, software based instrument, using standard protocols to record time domain, frequency domain and Poincare plot parameters. They were compared between groups for difference.
RESULTS
Mean age was 56 and 51 years, duration 6 years and 4 years respectively in hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) group of type 2 diabetics, which did not significantly differ in distribution of risk factors. There was poor glycaemic control (one third) in both groups and good pressure control in HT group. Both groups revealed all reduced HRV parameters with significant difference in-between only for LF/HF ratio (1.29 in HT vs 2.61 in NT group).
CONCLUSION
Our findings of HRV suggest that in type 2 diabetics with poor glycaemic and good pressure control, hypertension as a co-existing factor does not make significant difference in cardiac dysautonomia emphasizing residual risk despite antihypertensive treatment and need for early HRV screening, strict glycaemic control and other interventions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.