Coronary artery disease · 2025
Clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy followed by cutting balloon for calcified coronary lesions.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Tingquan, Jin Xian, Ma Shixin, Han Jiming, Shen Chengxing
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Rotational atherectomy is an effective method for treating severe coronary artery calcification; however, several challenges in its clinical application persist. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of rotational atherectomy combined with cutting balloon (RACB) versus rotational atherectomy with plain balloon (RAPB) in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions.
METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study included 326 patients who underwent rotational atherectomy at Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups (RACB and RAPB) on the basis of the type of balloon used. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize bias, and survival analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The procedural complication rates of the patients in the RACB and RAPB groups were comparable. Baseline covariates were balanced between groups after adjustment via PSM. Patients receiving RACB during their procedures had a lower MACE rate during the first postprocedural year in the unadjusted analysis (6.7% vs 16.2%, P < 0.05) and after adjustment with PSM (5.6% vs 16.1%, P < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed hazard ratios of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.23-0.82; P < 0.05) for the unadjusted model and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.17-0.76; P < 0.01) for the PSM-adjusted model.
CONCLUSION: Performing RACB before stent implantation was demonstrated to be a safe and effective strategy for managing severely calcified coronary lesions.
METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study included 326 patients who underwent rotational atherectomy at Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups (RACB and RAPB) on the basis of the type of balloon used. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize bias, and survival analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The procedural complication rates of the patients in the RACB and RAPB groups were comparable. Baseline covariates were balanced between groups after adjustment via PSM. Patients receiving RACB during their procedures had a lower MACE rate during the first postprocedural year in the unadjusted analysis (6.7% vs 16.2%, P < 0.05) and after adjustment with PSM (5.6% vs 16.1%, P < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed hazard ratios of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.23-0.82; P < 0.05) for the unadjusted model and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.17-0.76; P < 0.01) for the PSM-adjusted model.
CONCLUSION: Performing RACB before stent implantation was demonstrated to be a safe and effective strategy for managing severely calcified coronary lesions.