Journal of diabetes investigation · 2018
Understanding of antidiabetic medication is associated with blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes: At baseline date of the KAMOGAWA-DM cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakai Ryosuke, Hashimoto Yoshitaka, Ushigome Emi, Okamura Takuro, Hamaguchi Masahide, Yamazaki Masahiro, Oda Yohei, Fukui Michiaki
Аннотация
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Medication adherence, which is decreased by a poor understanding of medications, has a close association with blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, a relationship between the understanding of antidiabetic medication and blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes is unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the understanding of antidiabetic medication and blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lifestyle factors were evaluated by a questionnaire method, in the present cross-sectional study. Poor understanding of antidiabetic medication (PUAD) was defined as a discrepancy between the answer and the actual use of oral antidiabetic medication on the questionnaire. Poor blood glucose level was defined as hemoglobin A1c ≥8%. To investigate the impact of PUAD on poor blood glucose level, propensity-score matching analysis was used to remove the bias of confounding variables, including sex, age, log (duration of diabetes +1), body mass index, number of oral antidiabetic medications, smoking status, alcohol drinking, exercise, nephropathy, neuropathy, oral antidiabetic medications and insulin.
RESULTS: Among 479 patients, 40 patients (8.4%) were categorized into the PUAD group. The hemoglobin A1c of patients with PUAD was higher than that of patients without (7.5 [1.3] vs 7.2 [0.9]%, P = 0.041). In the propensity-matched 74 patients, PUAD was associated with poor blood glucose level (odds ratio 5.45, 95% confidence interval 1.54-25.8, P = 0.007) by logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: A poor understanding of antidiabetic medication is associated with poor blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lifestyle factors were evaluated by a questionnaire method, in the present cross-sectional study. Poor understanding of antidiabetic medication (PUAD) was defined as a discrepancy between the answer and the actual use of oral antidiabetic medication on the questionnaire. Poor blood glucose level was defined as hemoglobin A1c ≥8%. To investigate the impact of PUAD on poor blood glucose level, propensity-score matching analysis was used to remove the bias of confounding variables, including sex, age, log (duration of diabetes +1), body mass index, number of oral antidiabetic medications, smoking status, alcohol drinking, exercise, nephropathy, neuropathy, oral antidiabetic medications and insulin.
RESULTS: Among 479 patients, 40 patients (8.4%) were categorized into the PUAD group. The hemoglobin A1c of patients with PUAD was higher than that of patients without (7.5 [1.3] vs 7.2 [0.9]%, P = 0.041). In the propensity-matched 74 patients, PUAD was associated with poor blood glucose level (odds ratio 5.45, 95% confidence interval 1.54-25.8, P = 0.007) by logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: A poor understanding of antidiabetic medication is associated with poor blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes.