International urogynecology journal · 2023
A scoping review exploring stigma associated with postpartum urinary incontinence.
СтатьяScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cox Jordyn M, Sánchez-Polán Miguel, Mota Patrícia, Barakat Ruben, Nagpal Taniya S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Postpartum urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent, yet health-seeking behaviours for prevention and treatment are markedly low. Health-related stigma refers to conditions that may be socially devalued and considered deviating from "expected norms" and is a barrier to equitable health care. It may be plausible that stigma is associated with postpartum UI and leads to avoiding health-seeking behaviours, which this scoping review sought to examine and summarize.
METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews was followed. The following keywords were used to develop a search strategy: Postpartum, Urinary Incontinence and Stigma. The search was carried out on PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global. All study designs (clinical trials, observational studies, qualitative studies) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and mapped to identify causal factors of postpartum UI stigma and implications for outcomes and behaviours.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. Most studies utilized questionnaires assessing constructs related to quality of life that also captured potential stigma, or interviews. Sources of postpartum UI stigma included community values surrounding UI and self-stigma, whereby participants directed stereotypes associated with urinary leakage towards themselves. Implications of postpartum UI stigma included negative mental emotions such as shame and embarrassment, which led to avoiding situations where they needed to disclose symptoms, including in health care environments.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research requires a purposeful assessment of postpartum UI stigma to learn from lived experience how to mitigate stigma and improve quality of care.
METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews was followed. The following keywords were used to develop a search strategy: Postpartum, Urinary Incontinence and Stigma. The search was carried out on PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global. All study designs (clinical trials, observational studies, qualitative studies) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and mapped to identify causal factors of postpartum UI stigma and implications for outcomes and behaviours.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. Most studies utilized questionnaires assessing constructs related to quality of life that also captured potential stigma, or interviews. Sources of postpartum UI stigma included community values surrounding UI and self-stigma, whereby participants directed stereotypes associated with urinary leakage towards themselves. Implications of postpartum UI stigma included negative mental emotions such as shame and embarrassment, which led to avoiding situations where they needed to disclose symptoms, including in health care environments.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research requires a purposeful assessment of postpartum UI stigma to learn from lived experience how to mitigate stigma and improve quality of care.