Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2008
Quantification of MRI measured myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans: a comparison with positron emission tomography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fritz-Hansen Thomas, Hove Jens D, Kofoed Klaus F, Kelbaek Henning, Larsson Henrik B W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To validate a noninvasive quantitative MRI technique, the K(i) perfusion method, for myocardial perfusion in humans using (13)N-ammonia PET as a reference method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy males (64 +/- 8 years) were examined with combined PET and MRI perfusion imaging at rest and during stress induced by dipyridamole in order to determine the myocardial perfusion reserve. Myocardial and blood time concentration curves obtained by Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI and (13)N-ammonia PET were fitted by a two-compartment perfusion model.
RESULTS: Mean perfusion values (+/-SD) derived from the MRI method at rest and at hyperemia were 80 +/- 20 and 183 +/- 56 mL/min/100 g, respectively. The same data for PET were 71 +/- 16 and 203 +/- 67 mL/min/100 g. A linear relationship was observed between MRI and PET-derived myocardial perfusion reserve for regional and global data. Linear regression for the global absolute perfusion reserve gave a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P < 0.004, y=0.83x-6.9). A good agreement between the two methods to determine low or high perfusion reserves was found.
CONCLUSION: Our data provide validation of the perfusion marker K(i) derived by the MRI method as a quantitative marker for myocardial perfusion in healthy humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy males (64 +/- 8 years) were examined with combined PET and MRI perfusion imaging at rest and during stress induced by dipyridamole in order to determine the myocardial perfusion reserve. Myocardial and blood time concentration curves obtained by Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI and (13)N-ammonia PET were fitted by a two-compartment perfusion model.
RESULTS: Mean perfusion values (+/-SD) derived from the MRI method at rest and at hyperemia were 80 +/- 20 and 183 +/- 56 mL/min/100 g, respectively. The same data for PET were 71 +/- 16 and 203 +/- 67 mL/min/100 g. A linear relationship was observed between MRI and PET-derived myocardial perfusion reserve for regional and global data. Linear regression for the global absolute perfusion reserve gave a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P < 0.004, y=0.83x-6.9). A good agreement between the two methods to determine low or high perfusion reserves was found.
CONCLUSION: Our data provide validation of the perfusion marker K(i) derived by the MRI method as a quantitative marker for myocardial perfusion in healthy humans.