MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.309

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of orthopedics · 2013

Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia.

Mahnik Alan, Mahnik Silvija, Dimnjakovic Damjan, Curic Stjepan, Smoljanovic Tomislav, Bojanic Ivan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To investigate current preferences and opinions on the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in Croatia.

METHODS

The survey was conducted using a questionnaire which was sent by e-mail to all 189 members of the Croatian Orthopaedic and Traumatology Association. Only respondents who had performed at least one ACL reconstruction during 2011 were asked to fill out the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty nine surgeons responded to the survey. Nearly all participants (95%) used semitendinosus/gracilis tendon autograft for reconstruction and only 5% used bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. No other graft type had been used. The accessory anteromedial portal was preferred over the transtibial approach (67% vs 33%). Suspensory fixation was the most common graft fixation method (62%) for the femoral side, followed by the cross-pin (33%) and bioabsorbable interference screw (5%). Almost all respondents (97%) used a bioabsorbable interference screw for tibial side graft fixation.

CONCLUSION

The results show that ACL reconstruction surgery in Croatia is in step with the recommendations from latest world literature.

Для цитирования: Mahnik Alan, Mahnik Silvija, Dimnjakovic Damjan, Curic Stjepan, Smoljanovic Tomislav, Bojanic Ivan. Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia.. World journal of orthopedics. 2013. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.309.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.