Clinical chemistry · 2025
Enrichment of Microbial DNA in Plasma to Improve Pathogen Detection in Sepsis: A Pilot Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dominguez Eddie G, McDonald Bradon R, Zhang Haikun, Stephens Michelle D, Dietmann Elise C, Nedden Megan, Byington Nicole, Thompson Sydney, Junak Mary, Pepperell Caitlin S, Kisat Mehreen T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of sepsis and timely identification of pathogens in critically ill patients remains challenging. Plasma metagenomic sequencing to detect microbial cell-free DNA (mDNA) has shown promise, but low abundance of mDNA in plasma limits sensitivity and necessitates high sequencing depth. mDNA is shorter and more fragmented than human cell-free DNA. Here, we evaluated whether combining single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) sequencing library preparation and size selection can enrich mDNA and improve pathogen detection.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 48 trauma patients and collected daily blood samples during the first 10 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. For patients with culture-proven infections, we extracted plasma DNA, prepared double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and ssDNA sequencing libraries, and applied size selection to exclude fragments >110 bp. Following sequencing, we performed taxonomic classification, and evaluated differences in mDNA fractions and in sensitivity for pathogen detection (compared to background noise).
RESULTS: We analyzed 46 plasma samples from 5 patients who developed culture-proven infections, including 17 samples coincident with positive microbial cultures. Size-selected ssDNA libraries showed the total mDNA fraction 204-fold higher on average than conventional dsDNA libraries (P < 0.0001). However, for pathogen-specific DNA (at the genus level), the highest sensitivity was observed in size-selected dsDNA (82%), compared to dsDNA (41%), ssDNA (71%), and size-selected ssDNA (35%) library preparations.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that combining ssDNA library preparation together with fragment size selection improves mDNA yield, potentially reducing sequencing requirements. However, at the genus level, this combination also increases background noise, which limits sensitivity for pathogen detection.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 48 trauma patients and collected daily blood samples during the first 10 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. For patients with culture-proven infections, we extracted plasma DNA, prepared double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and ssDNA sequencing libraries, and applied size selection to exclude fragments >110 bp. Following sequencing, we performed taxonomic classification, and evaluated differences in mDNA fractions and in sensitivity for pathogen detection (compared to background noise).
RESULTS: We analyzed 46 plasma samples from 5 patients who developed culture-proven infections, including 17 samples coincident with positive microbial cultures. Size-selected ssDNA libraries showed the total mDNA fraction 204-fold higher on average than conventional dsDNA libraries (P < 0.0001). However, for pathogen-specific DNA (at the genus level), the highest sensitivity was observed in size-selected dsDNA (82%), compared to dsDNA (41%), ssDNA (71%), and size-selected ssDNA (35%) library preparations.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that combining ssDNA library preparation together with fragment size selection improves mDNA yield, potentially reducing sequencing requirements. However, at the genus level, this combination also increases background noise, which limits sensitivity for pathogen detection.