Genetic Testing in Adults over 50 Years with Chronic Kidney Disease: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Implications in a Specialized Kidney Genetics Clinic.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schott Clara, Alajmi Mohammad, Bukhari Mohammad, Relouw Sydney, Wang Jian, McIntyre Adam D, Baker Cadence, Colaiacovo Samantha, Campagnolo Carla, Almada Offerni Gabriela, Blake Peter G, Chiu Micheal, Cowan Andrea, Garg Amit X, Gunaratnam Lakshman, House Andrew A, Huang Shih-Han Susan, Iyer Hariharan, Jain Arsh K, Jevnikar Anthony M, Johnson John, Lotfy Khaled, Moist Louise, Rehman Faisal, Roshanov Pavel S, Sultan Nabil, Weir Matthew A, Basharat Pari, Florendo-Cumbermack Anita, Khan Tayyab, Thain Jenny, Kidd Kendrah, Kmoch Stanislav, Bleyer Anthony J, Bhangu Jaspreet, Hegele Robert A, Connaughton Dervla M
Аннотация
Background: Genetic causes of chronic diseases, once considered rare in adult-onset disease, now account for between 10 and 20% of cases of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Confirming a genetic diagnosis can influence disease management; however, the utility of genetic testing in older adults remains poorly understood, partly due to age-based restrictions on testing access. To better evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of genetic testing in this population, we analyzed data from adults aged ≥50 years with CKD who were assessed in a specialized kidney genetics clinic. Methods: We studied a cohort of 125 adults with CKD aged ≥50 years at the time of genetic testing. Genetic testing included gene panels targeting disease-related genes based on clinical phenotype, and/or exome sequencing for additional monogenic causes if the initial panel testing was inconclusive. Results: Pathogenic variants in disease-related genes were identified in 38% of patients. The highest diagnostic yield (48%) was in patients aged 50-54 years. The most common diagnosis post-testing was glomerulopathies (32%). Clinical utility, shown through the case series, included modifications to treatment and clinical management, as well as a reduction in the diagnostic odyssey. Conclusions: Our findings from a dedicated Kidney Genetics Clinic show that genetic testing in adults ≥50 years with CKD has significant diagnostic and clinical utility. These results support guideline recommendations that there should be no upper age limit for genetic testing. Future research in unselected CKD populations is needed to establish the broader applicability and feasibility of genetic testing in older adults.