MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2459/01.jcm.0000228686.87086.bd

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2006

Usefulness and limitations of the surface electrocardiogram in the classification of right and left atrial flutter.

Inama Giuseppe, Pedrinazzi Claudio, Durin Ornella, Agricola Pietro, Romagnoli Giulio, Gazzaniga Pietro

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia that may cause significant symptoms, including palpitations, dyspnoea, chest pain and even syncope. Frequently, it is possible to diagnose atrial flutter with a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG), looking for distinctive waves in leads II, III, aVF, aVL, V1 and V2. Puech and Waldo developed the first classification of atrial flutter in the 1970s. These authors divided the dysrhythmia into types I and II. Therefore, in 2001, the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology developed a new classification of atrial flutter based not only on the ECG, but also on the electrophysiological mechanism. More recently, Scheinman and colleagues have provided an updated classification and nomenclature. Terms such as common, uncommon, typical, reverse typical or atypical flutter are abandoned, because they may generate confusion. The authors worked out a new terminology, which differentiates atrial flutter only on the basis of electrophysiological mechanism.

Для цитирования: Inama Giuseppe, Pedrinazzi Claudio, Durin Ornella, Agricola Pietro, Romagnoli Giulio, Gazzaniga Pietro. Usefulness and limitations of the surface electrocardiogram in the classification of right and left atrial flutter.. Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). 2006. DOI: 10.2459/01.jcm.0000228686.87086.bd.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.