European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2017
Ribcage kinematics during exercise justifies thoracoscopic versus postero-lateral thoracotomy lobectomy prompt recovery.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
LoMauro Antonella, Aliverti Andrea, Chiesa Melania, Cattaneo Margherita, Privitera Emilia, Tosi Davide, Nosotti Mario, Santambrogio Luigi, Palleschi Alessandro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach is encouraged over postero-lateral thoracotomy (PLT) for lobectomy in lung cancer. We compare the ribcage kinematics during exercise before and after both procedures, assuming that VATS, being minimally invasive, could better preserve ribcage expansion.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients undergoing lobectomy by means of VATS (n = 20) or PLT (n = 11) were compared presurgery, after chest drainage removal (T1) and 2 months post-surgery (T2) during quiet breathing and incremental exercise. Spirometry, chest pain, ventilatory pattern and expansions of the ribcage (ΔVRC) and abdomen were measured. Furthermore, the expansion of the ribcage and abdomen in the operated (ΔVRC-OP and ΔVAB-OP, respectively) and non-operated (ΔVRC-NO and ΔVAB-NO, respectively) sides was also considered.
RESULTS: At T1, in both groups, spirometry worsened and chest pain increased, being higher after PLT. Tidal volume (VT) decreased after PLT because the ribcage expanded less due to reduced ΔVRC-OP. Contrary to this, in VATS, there were no changes in VT and ΔVRC, although ΔVRC-OP was lower, because ΔVRC-NO increased at high level of exercise. At T2, ΔVRC-OP was completely restored after VATS. At high levels of exercise following PLT, although patients still showed reduced ΔVRC and ΔVRC-OP, VT was restored owing to increased ΔVAB-NO.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate VATS to have a reduced impact on ribcage kinematics while PLT induced restriction more markedly during exercise and still present 2 months after surgery. Patients adopt 2 different compensatory mechanisms, by shifting the expansion toward the contralateral ribcage after VATS and toward the abdomen after PLT. Our study justifies thoracoscopic lobectomy prompt recovery.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02910453).
METHODS: Thirty-one patients undergoing lobectomy by means of VATS (n = 20) or PLT (n = 11) were compared presurgery, after chest drainage removal (T1) and 2 months post-surgery (T2) during quiet breathing and incremental exercise. Spirometry, chest pain, ventilatory pattern and expansions of the ribcage (ΔVRC) and abdomen were measured. Furthermore, the expansion of the ribcage and abdomen in the operated (ΔVRC-OP and ΔVAB-OP, respectively) and non-operated (ΔVRC-NO and ΔVAB-NO, respectively) sides was also considered.
RESULTS: At T1, in both groups, spirometry worsened and chest pain increased, being higher after PLT. Tidal volume (VT) decreased after PLT because the ribcage expanded less due to reduced ΔVRC-OP. Contrary to this, in VATS, there were no changes in VT and ΔVRC, although ΔVRC-OP was lower, because ΔVRC-NO increased at high level of exercise. At T2, ΔVRC-OP was completely restored after VATS. At high levels of exercise following PLT, although patients still showed reduced ΔVRC and ΔVRC-OP, VT was restored owing to increased ΔVAB-NO.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate VATS to have a reduced impact on ribcage kinematics while PLT induced restriction more markedly during exercise and still present 2 months after surgery. Patients adopt 2 different compensatory mechanisms, by shifting the expansion toward the contralateral ribcage after VATS and toward the abdomen after PLT. Our study justifies thoracoscopic lobectomy prompt recovery.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02910453).