The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2015
Subsequent pregnancy outcome after preterm breech delivery, a population based cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bergenhenegouwen Lester, Ensing Sabine, Ravelli Anita C J, Schaaf Jelle, Kok Marjolein, Mol Ben-Willem
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the mode of delivery in women with preterm breech presentation on neonatal and maternal outcome in the subsequent pregnancy.
METHODS: Nationwide population-based cohort study in the Netherlands of women with a preterm breech delivery and a subsequent delivery in the years 1999-2007. We compared planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal delivery for perinatal outcomes in both pregnancies.
RESULTS: We identified 1543 women in the study period, of whom 259 (17%) women had a planned caesarean section and 1284 (83%) women had a planned vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. In the subsequent pregnancy, perinatal mortality was 1.1% (3/259) for women with a planned caesarean section in the first pregnancy and 0.5% (6/1284) for women with a planned vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy (aOR 1.8; 95% CI 0.31-10.1). Composite adverse neonatal outcome was 2.3% (6/259) versus 1.5% (19/1284), (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 0.55-4.2). The average risk of perinatal mortality over two pregnancies was 1.9% (10/518) for planned caesarean section and 2.0% (51/2568) for planned vaginal delivery, (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.49-1.9).
CONCLUSION: In women with a preterm breech delivery, planned caesarean section does not reduce perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, or maternal morbidity rate over the course of two pregnancies.
METHODS: Nationwide population-based cohort study in the Netherlands of women with a preterm breech delivery and a subsequent delivery in the years 1999-2007. We compared planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal delivery for perinatal outcomes in both pregnancies.
RESULTS: We identified 1543 women in the study period, of whom 259 (17%) women had a planned caesarean section and 1284 (83%) women had a planned vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. In the subsequent pregnancy, perinatal mortality was 1.1% (3/259) for women with a planned caesarean section in the first pregnancy and 0.5% (6/1284) for women with a planned vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy (aOR 1.8; 95% CI 0.31-10.1). Composite adverse neonatal outcome was 2.3% (6/259) versus 1.5% (19/1284), (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 0.55-4.2). The average risk of perinatal mortality over two pregnancies was 1.9% (10/518) for planned caesarean section and 2.0% (51/2568) for planned vaginal delivery, (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.49-1.9).
CONCLUSION: In women with a preterm breech delivery, planned caesarean section does not reduce perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, or maternal morbidity rate over the course of two pregnancies.