The heart surgery forum · 2007
Open-chest device closure for the minimally invasive management of atrial septal defect in young children.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Hao, Li Shou-jun, Li Yong-qing, Wang Hao, Hu Sheng-shou
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We integrated a catheter-based device and minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of atrial septal defect for children younger than 2 years old.
METHODS: Forty-three patients were divided into 3 groups: group A underwent open-chest device closure with a right lateral thoracotomy (n = 12), group B underwent open-heart repair with a right lateral thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 11), and group C underwent open-heart repair with a median thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 20).
RESULTS: Group A had the lowest weight (9.25 +/- 1.3 kg) and smallest defect size (10.25 +/- 3.9 mm). In group A, 2 patients had to be transitioned to open-heart repair after unsuccessful occlusion. Compared with the open-heart groups, the device group had a shorter total operation time (111 +/- 39 minutes), required the minimum amount of blood products (39 +/- 38 mL), and had a smaller amount of pleural drainage in the first 12 hours after the procedure (29 +/- 12 mL). All patients were discharged. The right ventricular end-diastolic diameter reduced significantly after the repair; furthermore, there was no difference in the size of reduction. However, the device group had the highest medical costs (30,639 +/- 3831 Chinese yuan). During the follow-up, there were no occluder-related complications observed in Group A, and there were no residual shunts or arrhythmia observed in the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The open-chest device closure was safely performed as a supplement for percutaneous treatment for young children.
METHODS: Forty-three patients were divided into 3 groups: group A underwent open-chest device closure with a right lateral thoracotomy (n = 12), group B underwent open-heart repair with a right lateral thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 11), and group C underwent open-heart repair with a median thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 20).
RESULTS: Group A had the lowest weight (9.25 +/- 1.3 kg) and smallest defect size (10.25 +/- 3.9 mm). In group A, 2 patients had to be transitioned to open-heart repair after unsuccessful occlusion. Compared with the open-heart groups, the device group had a shorter total operation time (111 +/- 39 minutes), required the minimum amount of blood products (39 +/- 38 mL), and had a smaller amount of pleural drainage in the first 12 hours after the procedure (29 +/- 12 mL). All patients were discharged. The right ventricular end-diastolic diameter reduced significantly after the repair; furthermore, there was no difference in the size of reduction. However, the device group had the highest medical costs (30,639 +/- 3831 Chinese yuan). During the follow-up, there were no occluder-related complications observed in Group A, and there were no residual shunts or arrhythmia observed in the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The open-chest device closure was safely performed as a supplement for percutaneous treatment for young children.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsCardiac CatheterizationCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Septal Defects, AtrialHumansInfantMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsProbabilityRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival RateThoracotomyTreatment Outcome