Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2005
Spectrum of surgical complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in a prospectively randomized study of two immunosuppressive protocols.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Steurer Wolfgang, Malaise Jacques, Mark Walter, Koenigsrainer Alfred, Margreiter Raimund, Euro-SPK Study Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) has evolved as an effective treatment for patients with end-stage nephropathy due to type 1 diabetes mellitus. This report analyses the spectrum of surgical complications among patients receiving tacrolimus and cyclosporin microemulsion (ME)-based therapy for SPK transplantation.
METHODS: The analysis included 205 patients randomly assigned to tacrolimus (n = 103) or cyclosporin-ME (n = 102) in the Euro-SPK 001 study. Surgical complications were defined as any intervention in the 3-month post-operative course related to the transplant procedure.
RESULTS: In the tacrolimus vs cyclosporin-ME group, repeat laparotomy was required by fewer patients (26 vs 43%, respectively; P = 0.01) and at a later stage post-transplant (26+/-26 vs 14+/-17 days; P = 0.05). Also, thrombosis of graft vessels (2 vs 9%; P = 0.03) and repeat laparotomy for intra-abdominal haemorrhage within the first 3 months (8 vs 22%; P = 0.005) occurred significantly less frequently with tacrolimus vs cyclosporin-ME. A donor age of > or =45 years was a significant determinant for surgical complications requiring repeat laparotomy, regardless of the type of immunosuppression. Portal anastomosis was the safest method of endocrine venous drainage, and Roux-en-Y loop for enteric exocrine drainage was associated with a higher re-operation rate than duodenoenterostomy. Repeat laparotomy had no impact on patient survival, but significantly reduced kidney and pancreas graft survival in the cyclosporin-ME group (kidney: P<0.01; pancreas: P<0.001) and in both groups combined (P < or = 0.05 and P<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The immunological benefits of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin-ME treatment result in a lower incidence of repeat laparotomies post-transplant and a reduced in-hospital stay. Fewer repeat laparotomies translate into improved pancreas and kidney graft survival.
METHODS: The analysis included 205 patients randomly assigned to tacrolimus (n = 103) or cyclosporin-ME (n = 102) in the Euro-SPK 001 study. Surgical complications were defined as any intervention in the 3-month post-operative course related to the transplant procedure.
RESULTS: In the tacrolimus vs cyclosporin-ME group, repeat laparotomy was required by fewer patients (26 vs 43%, respectively; P = 0.01) and at a later stage post-transplant (26+/-26 vs 14+/-17 days; P = 0.05). Also, thrombosis of graft vessels (2 vs 9%; P = 0.03) and repeat laparotomy for intra-abdominal haemorrhage within the first 3 months (8 vs 22%; P = 0.005) occurred significantly less frequently with tacrolimus vs cyclosporin-ME. A donor age of > or =45 years was a significant determinant for surgical complications requiring repeat laparotomy, regardless of the type of immunosuppression. Portal anastomosis was the safest method of endocrine venous drainage, and Roux-en-Y loop for enteric exocrine drainage was associated with a higher re-operation rate than duodenoenterostomy. Repeat laparotomy had no impact on patient survival, but significantly reduced kidney and pancreas graft survival in the cyclosporin-ME group (kidney: P<0.01; pancreas: P<0.001) and in both groups combined (P < or = 0.05 and P<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The immunological benefits of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin-ME treatment result in a lower incidence of repeat laparotomies post-transplant and a reduced in-hospital stay. Fewer repeat laparotomies translate into improved pancreas and kidney graft survival.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAge FactorsCyclosporineDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic NephropathiesEuropeFollow-Up StudiesGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIncidenceIsraelKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationLaparotomyMiddle AgedPancreas TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesReoperationSurvival RateTacrolimusTreatment Outcome