MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/rcs.64

Медицинская библиотека · The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2006

Robotics in cardiac surgery: the Istanbul experience.

Sagbas Ertan, Akpinar Belhhan, Sanisoglu Ilhan, Caynak Baris, Guden Mustafa, Ozbek Ugur, Bayramoglu Zehra, Bayindir Osman

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Robots are sensor-based tools capable of performing precise, accurate and versatile actions. Initially designed to spare humans from risky tasks, robots have progressed into revolutionary tools for surgeons. Tele-operated robots, such as the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA), have allowed cardiac procedures to start benefiting from robotics as an enhancement to traditional minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

The aim of this text was to discuss our experience with the da Vinci system during a 12 month period in which 61 cardiac patients were operated on. There were 59 coronary bypass patients (CABG) and two atrial septal defect (ASD) closures.

RESULTS

Two patients (3.3%) had to be converted to median sternotomy because of pleural adhesions. There were no procedure- or device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests that robotics can be integrated into routine cardiac surgical practice. Systematic training, team dedication and proper patient selection are important factors that determine the success of a robotic surgery programme.

Для цитирования: Sagbas Ertan, Akpinar Belhhan, Sanisoglu Ilhan, Caynak Baris, Guden Mustafa, Ozbek Ugur, Bayramoglu Zehra, Bayindir Osman. Robotics in cardiac surgery: the Istanbul experience.. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. 2006. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.64.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.