JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons · 2002
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: relationship of pathology and operative time.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Del Pin Christina A, Arthur Karen S, Honig Christine, Silverman Elaine M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the use and timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of both acute and chronic cholecystitis. Acute advocates claim to avoid fibrosis and potential dissection injuries, whereas chronic proponents avoid poor visualization due to edema and possible conversion. This study of both acute and chronic cholecystitis cases examines the relationships between pathology, operative time, and outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and pathology of acute (n = 9) and chronic (n = 62) laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases, performed by 2 surgeons from 1995 to 1999 was undertaken. Using multiple regression techniques, the relationship between operative time and age, sex, race, presenting symptoms, and degree of pathologic cholecystitis was evaluated.
RESULTS: One case of acute gangrenous cholecystitis required conversion. None of the chronic cases required conversion. In single variable analysis, abnormal liver function tests, chronic inflammation, wall thickness, and number of stones were each predictive of longer operative time. However, in the multiple regression, abnormal liver function tests were the only clinical factor that remained a predictor of operative time (16 minutes longer, P = 0.05). Time from presentation to operation had no effect on operative time. Twelve patients had preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 4 had choledocholithiasis (acute n = 1, chronic n = 3). Two chronic patients required postoperative endoscopy for a cystic duct leak (n = 1) and choledocholithiasis (n = 1). The adjusted average operative time for acute and chronic cases was similar (93 versus 74 minutes, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be done safely for both acute and chronic cholecystitis with similar operative times. Abnormal liver function tests are associated with longer operative time. Time lapse between presentation and operation has no effect on operative time or outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and pathology of acute (n = 9) and chronic (n = 62) laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases, performed by 2 surgeons from 1995 to 1999 was undertaken. Using multiple regression techniques, the relationship between operative time and age, sex, race, presenting symptoms, and degree of pathologic cholecystitis was evaluated.
RESULTS: One case of acute gangrenous cholecystitis required conversion. None of the chronic cases required conversion. In single variable analysis, abnormal liver function tests, chronic inflammation, wall thickness, and number of stones were each predictive of longer operative time. However, in the multiple regression, abnormal liver function tests were the only clinical factor that remained a predictor of operative time (16 minutes longer, P = 0.05). Time from presentation to operation had no effect on operative time. Twelve patients had preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 4 had choledocholithiasis (acute n = 1, chronic n = 3). Two chronic patients required postoperative endoscopy for a cystic duct leak (n = 1) and choledocholithiasis (n = 1). The adjusted average operative time for acute and chronic cases was similar (93 versus 74 minutes, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be done safely for both acute and chronic cholecystitis with similar operative times. Abnormal liver function tests are associated with longer operative time. Time lapse between presentation and operation has no effect on operative time or outcome.