The American journal on addictions · 2017
Methadone "callbacks" within a veterans affairs opioid treatment program: Detecting methadone misuse.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cotton Ann J, Shipley Leandra J, Glynn Lisa H, Tracy Josie, Saxon Andrew J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A "callback" requires patients to bring in take-home methadone doses for inspection. An opioid treatment program (OTP) quality-improvement project examined random versus "for-cause" callbacks.
METHOD: Eighty-two random callbacks and 60 for-cause callbacks were conducted among patients enrolled in an OTP (N = 183).
RESULTS: Among patients with more take home doses, 6% of random callbacks versus 44% of for-cause callbacks were failed. Among patients with fewer take home doses, 36% of for-cause callbacks were failed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: For-cause callbacks are more useful than random ones.
SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: For-cause callbacks based on clinical judgment detect methadone misuse. (Am J Addict 2017;26:50-52).
METHOD: Eighty-two random callbacks and 60 for-cause callbacks were conducted among patients enrolled in an OTP (N = 183).
RESULTS: Among patients with more take home doses, 6% of random callbacks versus 44% of for-cause callbacks were failed. Among patients with fewer take home doses, 36% of for-cause callbacks were failed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: For-cause callbacks are more useful than random ones.
SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: For-cause callbacks based on clinical judgment detect methadone misuse. (Am J Addict 2017;26:50-52).