Preventive medicine · 2023
Federal legal and regulatory aspects of contingency management incentives.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clark H Westley, Davis Matthew
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Incentives are an integral part of Contingency Management (CM) Programs for substance use disorder treatment, primarily for the treatment stimulant use disorders, but because stimulant use often co-occurs with opioid use, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) permits the use of CM incentives as a part of its State Opioid Response grant program. However, incentives implicate federal laws and could result in either financial penalties or criminal sanctions against programs that use them.
METHODS: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) is tasked with enforcing key federal laws that address the issues of kick-backs, inducements, and false claims. By looking at these laws and regulations, this paper seeks to create a clearer understanding of the the barriers providers face when utilizing CM, as well as the guardrails that can be put in place to alleviate those barriers.
RESULTS: This paper distills key concerns raised by the OIG and suggests critical guardrails that militate against fraud, waste and abuse.
CONCLUSION: Following the recommended guardrails should allow providers to employ CM strategies to help their patients by making clear that the intent is to help patients without engaging in kickbacks, illegal inducements or false claims.
METHODS: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) is tasked with enforcing key federal laws that address the issues of kick-backs, inducements, and false claims. By looking at these laws and regulations, this paper seeks to create a clearer understanding of the the barriers providers face when utilizing CM, as well as the guardrails that can be put in place to alleviate those barriers.
RESULTS: This paper distills key concerns raised by the OIG and suggests critical guardrails that militate against fraud, waste and abuse.
CONCLUSION: Following the recommended guardrails should allow providers to employ CM strategies to help their patients by making clear that the intent is to help patients without engaging in kickbacks, illegal inducements or false claims.