MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/gco.0b013e3283481212

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2011

Laboratory models for studying ectopic pregnancy.

Brown Jeremy K, Horne Andrew W

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding the cause of tubal ectopic pregnancy (tEP) remains incomplete. We aim to summarize the latest advances in laboratory models of tEP that we believe will, ultimately, contribute to improving the diagnosis and management of the condition.

RECENT FINDINGS: Progress in proteome prefractionation and multidimensional protein identification technology has proved particularly effective in identifying novel biomarkers of tEP. These, and related global proteomic and genomic approaches, have as yet to be fully exploited in this context but do have substantial potential to inform future hypothesis-driven studies. The majority of data generated since 2009 to explain the cause of tEP continues to derive from descriptive human ex-vivo studies. In-vitro models of fallopian tube ciliary and smooth muscle function have improved to a limited degree, on the back of continuing advances in imaging and data acquisition. We believe that the recent development of a primary human fallopian tube epithelium culture system represents the most significant recent advance in laboratory models for studying ectopic pregnancy. There remain no good animal models of tEP.

SUMMARY: The establishment of a viable animal model of tEP remains the key obstacle to a complete understanding of the cause of the condition.

Для цитирования: Brown Jeremy K, Horne Andrew W. Laboratory models for studying ectopic pregnancy.. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e3283481212.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.