MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.10.002

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of medicine · 2016

Treatment-Resistant Hypertension and Outcomes Based on Randomized Treatment Group in ALLHAT.

Bangalore Sripal, Davis Barry R, Cushman William C, Pressel Sara L, Muntner Paul M, Calhoun David A, Kostis John B, Whelton Paul K, Probstfield Jeffrey L, Rahman Mahboob, Black Henry R, ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although hypertension guidelines define treatment-resistant hypertension as blood pressure uncontrolled by ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, it is unknown whether patient prognosis differs when a diuretic is included.

METHODS

Participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) were randomly assigned to first-step therapy with chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril. At a Year 2 follow-up visit, those with average blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg systolic or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic on ≥3 antihypertensive medications, or blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg on ≥4 antihypertensive medications were identified as having apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. The prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension and its association with ALLHAT primary (combined fatal coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and secondary (all-cause mortality, stroke, heart failure, combined coronary heart disease, and combined cardiovascular disease) outcomes were identified for each treatment group.

RESULTS

Of participants assigned to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril, 9.6%, 11.4%, and 19.7%, respectively, had treatment-resistant hypertension. During mean follow-up of 2.9 years, primary outcome incidence was similar for those assigned to chlorthalidone compared with amlodipine or lisinopril (amlodipine- vs chlorthalidone-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.39; P = .53; lisinopril- vs chlorthalidone-adjusted HR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.70-1.60; P = .78). Secondary outcome risks were similar for most comparisons except coronary revascularization, which was higher with amlodipine than with chlorthalidone (HR 1.86; 95% CI, 1.11-3.11; P = .02). An as-treated analysis based on diuretic use produced similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, which titrated medications to a goal, participants assigned to chlorthalidone were less likely to develop treatment-resistant hypertension. However, prognoses in those with treatment-resistant hypertension were similar across treatment groups.

Для цитирования: Bangalore Sripal, Davis Barry R, Cushman William C, Pressel Sara L, Muntner Paul M, Calhoun David A, Kostis John B, Whelton Paul K, Probstfield Jeffrey L, Rahman Mahboob, Black Henry R, ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Treatment-Resistant Hypertension and Outcomes Based on Randomized Treatment Group in ALLHAT.. The American journal of medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.10.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.