American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1994
The measurement of diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy: which Korotkoff phase should be used?
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
López M C, Belizán J M, Villar J, Bergel E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the two Korotkoff phases, to estimate diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy.
STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 1194 nulliparous pregnant women were followed up prospectively from the twentieth week of pregnancy until delivery. Blood pressure measurements were obtained with random-zero sphygmomanometers at 20, 23, 25, 27, 31, and 35 weeks and then weekly until delivery. After 10 minutes of rest five blood pressure measurements were obtained in each position: supine, lateral, and seated. Korotkoff phases IV and V were obtained in each measurement.
RESULTS: The frequency of 0 values was always < 0.5% (n = 10,501 in each time and position). Mean differences between both phases throughout pregnancy fluctuates around 6 mm Hg. Minor differences (mean 3.7 mm Hg) without outlier values were observed in women with diastolic hypertension. Phase 5 showed a better association with other outcome variables related to hypertension, such as proteinuria, intrauterine growth retardation, and hyperuricemia.
CONCLUSION: Considering that phase 5 is easier to obtain, its use implies very few 0 values, that the difference between the two Korotkoff phases is around 6 mm Hg, and that the association with hypertension-related complications is similar to that of phase 4.
STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 1194 nulliparous pregnant women were followed up prospectively from the twentieth week of pregnancy until delivery. Blood pressure measurements were obtained with random-zero sphygmomanometers at 20, 23, 25, 27, 31, and 35 weeks and then weekly until delivery. After 10 minutes of rest five blood pressure measurements were obtained in each position: supine, lateral, and seated. Korotkoff phases IV and V were obtained in each measurement.
RESULTS: The frequency of 0 values was always < 0.5% (n = 10,501 in each time and position). Mean differences between both phases throughout pregnancy fluctuates around 6 mm Hg. Minor differences (mean 3.7 mm Hg) without outlier values were observed in women with diastolic hypertension. Phase 5 showed a better association with other outcome variables related to hypertension, such as proteinuria, intrauterine growth retardation, and hyperuricemia.
CONCLUSION: Considering that phase 5 is easier to obtain, its use implies very few 0 values, that the difference between the two Korotkoff phases is around 6 mm Hg, and that the association with hypertension-related complications is similar to that of phase 4.