Does radical cystectomy have a better prognosis than bladder conservative treatment in the real world?

PURPOSE: To compare the prognosis and quality of life between radical cystectomy and bladder conservative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the real world.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Patients treated for muscle invasive bladder cancer without metastases were retrospectively evaluated for overall survival, progression-free survival, and rehospitalization.

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients, 62 underwent bladder conservative treatment and 79 underwent radical cystectomy. Patients who underwent radical cystectomy had significantly better progression-free survival (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.12-3.00; p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.99-3.34; p = 0.03) than those who underwent conservative treatment. However, there was no significant difference in prognosis between patients who refused to undergo radical cystectomy and those who underwent. In addition, rehospitalization rates for complications and additional treatment were significantly higher in patients who received conservative treatment (69.3% vs. 34.2%; p < 0.01), and the length of hospital stay was also prolonged compared to patients who received radical cystectomy (26 vs. 9 days; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, conservative treatment had a significantly poorer prognosis than radical cystectomy, but there was no significant difference in prognosis when comparing patients who refused radical cystectomy and received conservative treatment with those who received radical cystectomy. However, hospitalization rates and length of stay were significantly worse for patients who chose conservative treatment, which may lead to a decline in quality of life.