Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity as a predictor of response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression.

BACKGROUND

Chronotherapeutic techniques (sleep deprivation and light therapy) are effective treatments for bipolar depression, but viable predictors of response for the daily clinical practice have not yet been established. The discrepancy between subjective and objective severity of the depressive syndrome has been proposed as a possible predictor of treatment outcome in depression. This study examined whether this discrepancy could predict response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression.

METHOD: We studied 149 consecutively admitted inpatients with a major depressive episode in course of bipolar disorder. Patients were treated with the combination of repeated sleep deprivation and bright light therapy. Severity of depression was evaluated using self-rated (Beck Depression Inventory: BDI) and observer-rated (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: HDRS) measures. BDI-HDRS discrepancy score at baseline was calculated, and its associations with clinical response and with depressive cognitive distortions, as measured on the Cognitions Questionnaire, were examined.

RESULTS

Among the 147 completers, 66% responded to treatment (50% reduction of HDRS score). The response rate in patients with low discrepancy scores and in patients with high discrepancy scores were 80.2% and 48.5%, respectively. High BDI-HDRS discrepancy predicted negative response to treatment with odds ratio of 3.79 (95%CI: 1.61-8.93). BDI-HDRS discrepancy was positively associated with depressive cognitive distortions.

LIMITATIONS: Potential factors affecting the discrepancy and outcome other than cognitive distortion were not examined in this study.

CONCLUSION

Higher BDI-HDRS discrepancy can predict poorer response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression. The tendency to generalize hopelessness may be a factor influencing the link between the discrepancy and outcome.