MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.20.00298

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020

Randomized Trial Comparing Double Versus Triple Bortezomib-Based Regimen in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Acute Kidney Injury Due to Cast Nephropathy.

Bridoux Frank, Arnulf Bertrand, Karlin Lionel, Blin Nicolas, Rabot Nolwenn, Macro Margaret, Audard Vincent, Belhadj Karim, Pegourie Brigitte, Gobert Pierre, Cornec Le Gall Emilie, Joly Bertrand, Karras Alexandre, Jaccard Arnaud, Augeul-Meunier Karine, Manier Salomon, Royer Bruno, Caillot Denis, Tiab Mourad, Delbes Sébastien, Suarez Felipe, Vigneau Cécile, Caillard Sophie, Arakelyan-Laboure Nina, Roos-Weil Damien, Chevret Sylvie, Fermand Jean Paul, MYRE study group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We report a multicenter controlled trial comparing renal recovery and tolerance profile of doublet versus triplet bortezomib-based regimens in patients with initial myeloma cast nephropathy (CN) and acute kidney injury (AKI) without need for dialysis.

METHODS

After symptomatic measures and high-dose dexamethasone, patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD), or BD plus cyclophosphamide (C-BD). In patients with < 50% reduction of serum free light chains (sFLCs) after 3 cycles, chemotherapy was reinforced with either cyclophosphamide (BD group) or thalidomide (C-BD group).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were enrolled in each group. At random assignment, characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, including median age (68 years) and serum creatinine level (305.5 and 273.5 µmol/L in BD and C-BD group, respectively). At 3 months, renal response rate (primary end point) was not different (41 v 47 responders in the BD and C-BD groups, respectively; relative risk [RR], 0.87; P = .46). Very good partial response (free light chain reduction ≥ 90%) or more was achieved in 36 and 47 patients, respectively (RR, 0.76; P = .10). After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, 69 in the BD group and 67 patients in the C-BD group had achieved sFLC level ≤ 500 mg/L. Serious adverse events were recorded in 30 and 40 patients, respectively. At 12 months, 19 patients had died (9 in the BD group v 10 in the C-BD group), including 10 (6 in the BD group and 4 in the C-BD group) from myeloma progression and 3 (0 in the BD group and 3 in the C-BD group) from infection. Within median follow-up of 27 months, 43 and 42 patients switched to new therapy, respectively. Overall, 50 patients (24 in the BD group and 26 in the C-BD group) had died.

CONCLUSION

This randomized study did not show any benefit of C-BD compared with BD on renal recovery of patients with initial CN not requiring dialysis. Adding cyclophosphamide did not sufficiently improve the efficacy-toxicity balance. Patients with myeloma with AKI are fragile, and indication for doublet or triplet regimen should be adapted to frailty.

Для цитирования: Bridoux Frank, Arnulf Bertrand, Karlin Lionel, Blin Nicolas, Rabot Nolwenn, Macro Margaret, Audard Vincent, Belhadj Karim, Pegourie Brigitte, Gobert Pierre, Cornec Le Gall Emilie, Joly Bertrand, Karras Alexandre, Jaccard Arnaud, Augeul-Meunier Karine, Manier Salomon, Royer Bruno, Caillot Denis, Tiab Mourad, Delbes Sébastien, Suarez Felipe, Vigneau Cécile, Caillard Sophie, Arakelyan-Laboure Nina, Roos-Weil Damien, Chevret Sylvie, Fermand Jean Paul, MYRE study group. Randomized Trial Comparing Double Versus Triple Bortezomib-Based Regimen in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Acute Kidney Injury Due to Cast Nephropathy.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2020. DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00298.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.