MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Anticancer research · 2015

Surgical treatment of metastatic femoral fractures: achieving an improved quality of life for cancer patients.

Morishige Masashi, Muramatsu Keiichi, Tominaga Yasuhiro, Hashimoto Takahiro, Taguchi Toshihiko

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The femur is the most common long bone affected by metastatic carcinoma. We report our experience regarding treatment of metastatic femoral fracture using femoral head prosthesis (FHP) or intramedullary nailing (IM nail) with augmentation by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Thirty-five complete fractures in 33 patients were treated surgically. Metastatic lesions were present in the femoral head to neck region (n=9), trochanteric to shaft region (n=23) and supracondular region (n=3).

RESULTS

Eight out of 9 patients with proximal femoral metastasis reconstructed by FHP were later able to walk outdoors. For the 11 patients with trochanteric metastasis, the short type of gamma nail was used for bony fixation. In two patients the inserted IM nails were broken. All other cases showed excellent clinical outcomes. For the 12 patients with femoral shaft metastasis, the long type of gamma nail was inserted. Nine cases showed excellent clinical outcomes without any serious complications.

CONCLUSION

FHP is indicated for metastases in the femoral head to neck region. IM nailing is best indicated when the lesion is located in the proximal to mid shaft and the patient's life expectancy is <6 month.

Для цитирования: Morishige Masashi, Muramatsu Keiichi, Tominaga Yasuhiro, Hashimoto Takahiro, Taguchi Toshihiko. Surgical treatment of metastatic femoral fractures: achieving an improved quality of life for cancer patients.. Anticancer research. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.