MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ijerph19031072

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022

A Scoping Review of Concussion Guidelines in Amateur Sports in the United Kingdom.

Scullion Emer, Heron Neil

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objectives To investigate which United Kingdom (UK) amateur sporting organisations have published sports-related concussion (SRC) guidelines, their accessibility and the extent to which they follow the Berlin statement recommendations. This article is targeted at those involved with designing and implementing SRC guidelines in amateur sport. Design Scoping Review. Data Sources The SRC guidelines of 15 sporting organisations were accessed through public materials available from the official organisation website. Eligibility Criteria: To be included in this review, sports must enjoy broad participation by UK amateur athletes with a high risk of athletes sustaining an SRC.

Results

15 sporting organisations were included in this review with two, British Cycling and British Eventing, found not to have published SRC guidelines. There was found to be a large discrepancy between the extent to which the sport-specific guides followed the Berlin statement recommendations.

Conclusions

The large discrepancy between the contents of the SRC guidelines may be putting the health of athletes at risk. We recommend the UK government publish standardised concussion guidelines based on the latest scientific research that must be used by all UK amateur sport groups.

Для цитирования: Scullion Emer, Heron Neil. A Scoping Review of Concussion Guidelines in Amateur Sports in the United Kingdom.. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031072.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.