DOI 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.06.101
A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Perioperative and Periprocedural Corneal Abrasions.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We assessed our institution's rate of perioperative and periprocedural corneal abrasions (CAs) and implemented a quality improvement project to improve our detection of CAs and decrease their incidence by at least 25% over 12 months.
DESIGN
Retrospective review before and after initiation of a quality improvement project at a single tertiary care institution
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed surgical and procedural patients requiring any type of anesthesia care over three 1-year time periods (2014-2015, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018). Using an electronic pharmacy-based query to identify patients who received proparacaine eye drops in the recovery room, we were able to estimate our incidence of CA during these time periods. We implemented a best practice plan to standardize CA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment after determining our baseline incidence of CA.
FINDINGS: Our baseline incidence rate of perioperative and periprocedural CAs was 0.22% (43/19,790 anesthetics) in the 2014-2015 time period. In the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 time periods, the incidence rate was reduced to 0.09% (21/23,652 anesthetics) and 0.1% (23/23,825 anesthetics), respectively. The use of a standardized CA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment plan reduced the relative risk of CAs by 59% in 2016-2017 (P < .001) and 56% in 2017-2018 (P = .001) compared to baseline, with an absolute reduction of 13% and 12% over those time periods.
CONCLUSION
Our data suggests that the adoption of a simple, standardized perioperative and periprocedural CA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment plan can result in sustained reductions in the occurrence of perioperative CAs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.