Cancer cytopathology · 2024
Urine cytology in the detection of renal cell carcinomas - a territory-wide multi-institutional retrospective review of more than 2 decades.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Joshua J X, Ng Joanna K M, Tang Cheuk-Yin, Chan Bryan C H, Chan Sau Yee, Law Jasmine H N, Teoh Jeremy Y, VandenBussche Christopher J, Tse Gary M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Compared with urothelial lesions of the upper urinary tract, the diagnostic performance of urine cytology in detection of renal cell carcinomas is underreported. This study aims to establish the role of urine cytology in the assessment of renal carcinomas by a multi-institute review of urine cytology from nephrectomy confirmed renal cell carcinomas, referenced against renal urothelial and squamous cell carcinomas.
METHODS: Records of nephrectomy performed from the 1990s to 2020s at three hospitals were retrieved and matched to urine cytology specimens collected within 1 year prior. Patient demographics, specimen descriptors, and histology and staging parameters were reviewed and compared against cytologic diagnoses.
RESULTS: There were 1147 cases of urine cytology matched with renal cell carcinomas, with 666 renal urothelial/squamous carcinomas for comparison. The detection rate for urothelial/squamous (atypia or above [C3+]: 63.1%; suspicious or above [C4+]: 24.0%) were higher than renal cell carcinoma (C3+: 13.1%; C4+: 1.5%) (p < 0.001). The positive rate for upper tract urine exceeded other collection methods at 45.0% (C3+) and 10.0% (C4+) (p < .01). Other factors associated with increased positive rates were male sex, collecting duct carcinoma histology, nuclear grade, and renal/sinus involvement (p < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed additional positive correlations with presence of sarcomatoid tumor cells, lymphovascular invasion, and perinephric fat involvement (p < .05). Larger lesion size and higher urine volume did not improve detection rates (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of renal cell carcinomas is suboptimal compared with urothelial carcinomas, although urine samples collected from cystoscopy or percutaneous nephrostomy significantly outperformed voided urine specimens.
METHODS: Records of nephrectomy performed from the 1990s to 2020s at three hospitals were retrieved and matched to urine cytology specimens collected within 1 year prior. Patient demographics, specimen descriptors, and histology and staging parameters were reviewed and compared against cytologic diagnoses.
RESULTS: There were 1147 cases of urine cytology matched with renal cell carcinomas, with 666 renal urothelial/squamous carcinomas for comparison. The detection rate for urothelial/squamous (atypia or above [C3+]: 63.1%; suspicious or above [C4+]: 24.0%) were higher than renal cell carcinoma (C3+: 13.1%; C4+: 1.5%) (p < 0.001). The positive rate for upper tract urine exceeded other collection methods at 45.0% (C3+) and 10.0% (C4+) (p < .01). Other factors associated with increased positive rates were male sex, collecting duct carcinoma histology, nuclear grade, and renal/sinus involvement (p < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed additional positive correlations with presence of sarcomatoid tumor cells, lymphovascular invasion, and perinephric fat involvement (p < .05). Larger lesion size and higher urine volume did not improve detection rates (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of renal cell carcinomas is suboptimal compared with urothelial carcinomas, although urine samples collected from cystoscopy or percutaneous nephrostomy significantly outperformed voided urine specimens.