Transplantation proceedings · 2004
One-year outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients receiving an alternative dosing regimen of daclizumab.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stratta R J, Alloway R R, Lo A, Hodge E E, PIVOT Study Group
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimen of daclizumab with no-antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.
METHODS: A total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled into this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study. The patients were randomized into three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for five doses (group I, n = 107), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for two doses (group II, n = 112), and no-antibody induction (group III, n = 78).
RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups, except for a higher proportion of African-Americans in group II. The incidence of composite events (acute rejection, graft loss, or death) at 1 year was 36.4%, 32.7%, and 48.7% for groups I, II, and III, respectively (P <.05, group II vs group III). The incidence of acute rejection was highest in group III (34.6%) compared to groups I and II (22.4% and 22.1%, respectively, P <.05). The mean time to acute rejection was delayed in group II (96 days) compared to 23 days in group I and 20 days in group III (P <.05). The adverse-event profiles were comparable among the three groups, except for a higher incidence of infection and readmissions in group III.
CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab was safe and effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection when compared to no induction. The alternative two-dose regimen of daclizumab was as effective as the conventional five-dose regimen and is logistically more desirable.
METHODS: A total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled into this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study. The patients were randomized into three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for five doses (group I, n = 107), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for two doses (group II, n = 112), and no-antibody induction (group III, n = 78).
RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups, except for a higher proportion of African-Americans in group II. The incidence of composite events (acute rejection, graft loss, or death) at 1 year was 36.4%, 32.7%, and 48.7% for groups I, II, and III, respectively (P <.05, group II vs group III). The incidence of acute rejection was highest in group III (34.6%) compared to groups I and II (22.4% and 22.1%, respectively, P <.05). The mean time to acute rejection was delayed in group II (96 days) compared to 23 days in group I and 20 days in group III (P <.05). The adverse-event profiles were comparable among the three groups, except for a higher incidence of infection and readmissions in group III.
CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab was safe and effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection when compared to no induction. The alternative two-dose regimen of daclizumab was as effective as the conventional five-dose regimen and is logistically more desirable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDaclizumabDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleGraft RejectionHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive AgentsIncidenceKidney TransplantationPancreas TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment FailureTreatment Outcome