MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00244-012-9800-5

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2012

Comparison of in vivo with in vitro pharmacokinetics of mercury between methylmercury chloride and methylmercury cysteine using rats and Caco2 cells.

Mori Nobuhiro, Yamamoto Megumi, Tsukada Eri, Yokooji Tomoharu, Matsumura Naoko, Sasaki Masanori, Murakami Teruo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The in vivo and in vitro pharmacokinetics of mercury (Hg) were compared between methylmercury chloride (MeHg·Cl) and methylmercury cysteine (MeHg-Cys) using rats and Caco2 cells because humans can be exposed to MeHg compounds through dietary fish. The in vivo pharmacokinetics of Hg immediately after the digestion of MeHg compounds are still obscure. In Caco2 cells, membrane uptake and subcellular distribution of MeHg compounds were examined. When rats received it intravenously, MeHg·Cl showed 20-fold greater plasma and 2-fold greater blood concentrations of Hg than MeHg-Cys, indicating that their pharmacokinetic properties are different. One hour later, however, Hg concentrations in plasma and blood became virtually identical between MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys, although blood Hg concentrations were >100-fold greater than those in plasma. When administered into the closed rat's jejunum loop, MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys were rapidly and efficiently taken up by intestinal membranes, and Hg was retained in intestinal membranes for a relatively long time. When administered orally, no difference was observed in plasma and blood Hg concentrations between MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys: plasma and blood Hg concentrations increased gradually and reached steady levels at 8 h after administration. In Caco2 cells, uptake of MeHg-Cys was significantly suppressed by L-leucine, although this was not seen with MeHg·Cl. In Caco2 cells, 81 % of Hg was recovered from cytosol fractions and 13 % of Hg from nuclear fractions (including debris) after a 2-h incubation with MeHg-Cys. In conclusion, the mechanism of membrane uptake and volume of distribution in the initial distribution phase were clearly different between MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys. However, such pharmacokinetic differences between them disappeared 1 h after intravenous and after oral routes of administration, possibly due to the metabolism in the body.

Для цитирования: Mori Nobuhiro, Yamamoto Megumi, Tsukada Eri, Yokooji Tomoharu, Matsumura Naoko, Sasaki Masanori, Murakami Teruo. Comparison of in vivo with in vitro pharmacokinetics of mercury between methylmercury chloride and methylmercury cysteine using rats and Caco2 cells.. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-012-9800-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.