MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.15441/ceem.23.005

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023

Mortality among adult patients with sepsis and septic shock in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Namgung Myeong, Ahn Chiwon, Park Yeonkyung, Kwak Il-Youp, Lee Jungguk, Won Moonho

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate mortality from sepsis and septic shock in Korea during the past 10 years, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched six databases for studies on mortality from sepsis and septic shock in adult patients. Primary outcomes were 28- or 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality from sepsis and septic shock. To assess the risk of bias, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk of Bias 2 tools. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022365739).

RESULTS

A total of 61 studies were included. The mortality rates from sepsis and septic shock at 28 or 30 days were 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0%-25.6%; I2=89%) and 27.6% (95% CI, 22.3%-33.5%; I2=98%), respectively, according to the Sepsis-3 criteria. Furthermore, in accordance with the Sepsis-3 criteria, the in-hospital mortality rates were 28.1% (95% CI, 25.2%-31.1%; I2=87%) and 34.3% (95% CI, 27.2%-42.2%; I2=97%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The mortality rates from sepsis and septic shock in Korea are high. In the case of septic shock, the in-hospital mortality rate is approximately 30%.

Для цитирования: Namgung Myeong, Ahn Chiwon, Park Yeonkyung, Kwak Il-Youp, Lee Jungguk, Won Moonho. Mortality among adult patients with sepsis and septic shock in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clinical and experimental emergency medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.23.005.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.