An ELISA-based antigenicity test of rabies recombinant glycoprotein cannot predict its protective potency in vivo.

The potency of human and veterinary rabies vaccines is measured based on the National Institute of Health (NIH) potency test that is laborious, time-consuming, variable, and requires sacrifice of large numbers of mice. ELISA-based methods quantifying rabies glycoprotein (rGP) are being developed as potential alternatives to the NIH potency test for release of rabies vaccines. The aim of the current study was focused on the evaluation of in vitro- and in vivo-based assays in order to assess their concurrence for adequate and reliable assessment of immunogenicity and protective potency of a plant-derived recombinant rGP. The recombinant rGP of strain ERA.KK was engineered, expressed and purified from Nicotiana benthamiana plants. The recombinant rGP excluded the transmembrane and intracytoplasmic domains. It was purified by chromatography (≥90%) from the plant biomass, characterized, and mainly presented as high molecular weight forms, most likely soluble aggregates, of the rGP ectodomain. It was well-recognized and quantified by an ELISA, which utilizes two mouse monoclonal antibodies, D1-25 and 1112-1, and which should only recognize the native trimeric form of the rGP. However, in mice, the recombinant rGP did not induce the production of anti-rabies virus neutralizing antibodies and did not confer protection after intracerebral viral challenge. Similar immunogenicity was observed in guinea pigs and rabbits. Our results demonstrate that use of the ELISA method described here is not predictive of performance in vivo. These data highlight the critical need to develop in vitro potency assays that reliably define the antigen content that can induce a protective response.