MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Collegium antropologicum · 2012

Value of rapid aetiological diagnosis in optimization of antimicrobial treatment in bacterial community acquired pneumonia.

Mareković Ivana, Plecko Vanda, Boras Zagorka, Pavlović Ladislav, Budimir Ana, Bosnjak Zrinka, Puretić Hrvoje, Zele-Starcević Lidija, Kalenić Smilja

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In 80 adult patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) conventional microbiological methods, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were performed and the appropriateness of the empirical antimicrobial treatment was evaluated according to bacterial pathogen detected. The aetiology was determined in 42 (52.5%) patients, with Streptococcus pneumoniae as the most common pathogen. PCR applied to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) provided 2 and PCR on sputum samples 1 additional aetiological diagnosis of CAP The mean CRP values in the S. pneumoniae group were not significantly higher than in the group with other aetiological diagnoses (166.89 mg/L vs. 160.11 mg/L, p = 0.457). In 23.8% (10/42) of patients with determined aetiology, the empirical antimicrobial treatment was inappropriate. PCR tests need further investigation, particularly those for the atypical pathogens, as they are predominant in inappropriately treated patients. Our results do not support the use of CRP as a rapid test to guide the antimicrobial treatment in patients with CAP.

Для цитирования: Mareković Ivana, Plecko Vanda, Boras Zagorka, Pavlović Ladislav, Budimir Ana, Bosnjak Zrinka, Puretić Hrvoje, Zele-Starcević Lidija, Kalenić Smilja. Value of rapid aetiological diagnosis in optimization of antimicrobial treatment in bacterial community acquired pneumonia.. Collegium antropologicum. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.