MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0212

Медицинская библиотека · Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024

Pretreatment With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Macherey-Meyer Sascha, Heyne Sebastian, Meertens Max Maria, Finke Karl, Mauri Victor, Ahrens Ingo, Baer Frank Michael, Eberhardt Frank, Horlitz Marc, Sinning Jan-Malte, Meissner Axel, Rosswinkel Benjamin, Baldus Stephan, Adler Christoph, Lee Samuel, KIM e.V.

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are often pretreated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) before a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). UFH pretreatment is intended to lessen the thrombotic burden, but there have been conflicting study findings on its safety and efficacy. We assessed the risks and benefits of UFH pretreatment with a retrospective analysis of registry data from the STEMI network of a German metropolitan region.

METHODS

Data from patients with STEMI referred for PPCI from 2005 to 2020 were evaluated with an adjusted outcome analysis, including propensity score matching (PSM). The endpoints included the patency of the infarct-related artery (IRA) after PPCI, in-hospital mortality, access-site bleeding, and the peak creatine kinase (CK) level.

RESULTS

We assessed data from 4632 patients with STEMI: 4420 (95.4%) were pretreated with UFH, and 212 (4.6%) were not. After PSM of 511 vs. 187 patients, the adjusted odds ratios for the various endpoints were (pretreatment vs. no pretreatment, with 95% confidence intervals): for impaired flow of the IRA, 1.01 [0.59; 1.74]; for in-hospital mortality, 1.46 [0.88; 2.42]; and for access-site bleeding, 0.59 [0.14; 2.46]. The peak creatine kinase levels were similar in the two groups (median, 1248.0 vs. 1376.5 U/L, estimated difference -134 [-611; 341]).

CONCLUSION

UFH pretreatment was less frequently performed in STEMI patients who had undergone cardiopulmonary resuscitation. UFH pretreatment was not associated with increased access-site bleeding, nor was it found to have significantly higher efficacy with respect to the relevant endpoints. The risks and benefits of UFH pretreatment should be weighed individually in each case, as evidence from high-quality clinical trials is lacking. Data from the existing literature suggest that no pretreatment is an option to be considered, as are certain alternative antithrombotic strategies.

Для цитирования: Macherey-Meyer Sascha, Heyne Sebastian, Meertens Max Maria, Finke Karl, Mauri Victor, Ahrens Ingo, Baer Frank Michael, Eberhardt Frank, Horlitz Marc, Sinning Jan-Malte, Meissner Axel, Rosswinkel Benjamin, Baldus Stephan, Adler Christoph, Lee Samuel, KIM e.V.. Pretreatment With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.. Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 2024. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0212.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.