MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27612

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2023

Quality of life and swallowing outcomes following major glossectomy: A prospective single-center experience.

Mitra Sandipta, Panda Smriti, Thakar Alok, Gautam Vimmi, Talukdar Kaustav M, Mani Suresh, Singh Chirom Amit, Sikka Kapil, Kumar Rajeev, Das Sumit Kumar, Singh Anup

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There exists a lacuna in the structured reporting of swallowing dysfunction and quality of life (QoL) outcome following major glossectomy.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study to assess the swallowing dysfunction and QoL following STG (subtotal glossectomy) or NTG (near total glossectomy) over a 6-month period using FEES and PAS scale, MDADI, and FACT-HN.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were available for analysis. The pre- and post-adjuvant evaluation revealed a statistically significant improvement in the composite MDADI and FACT-HN scores. Subscale analysis of FACT-HN scores revealed maximum deficit in the head and neck cancer-specific score domain followed by functional domain and social well-being domain, with serial improvement noted in the post-adjuvant setting.

CONCLUSION

This study showed serial improvement in terms of swallowing dysfunction although social and functional well-being domains related to QoL continued to reveal major deficits. Better outcomes were seen with preservation of bilateral base of tongue and mandible.

Для цитирования: Mitra Sandipta, Panda Smriti, Thakar Alok, Gautam Vimmi, Talukdar Kaustav M, Mani Suresh, Singh Chirom Amit, Sikka Kapil, Kumar Rajeev, Das Sumit Kumar, Singh Anup. Quality of life and swallowing outcomes following major glossectomy: A prospective single-center experience.. Head & neck. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27612.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.