Journal of advanced nursing · 2024
Clinical Supervision Models and Frameworks Used in Nursing: A Scoping Review.
СтатьяScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zonneveld Debbie, Conroy Tiffany, Lines Lauren
Аннотация
AIM: To provide an overview of clinical supervision models and frameworks used in nursing and map them to their areas of use in nursing.
DESIGN: A scoping review guided by JBI methodology for scoping reviews.
METHODS: A systematic search using CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Emcare databases for English-language papers published at any time and ProQuest and Google Scholar databases for unpublished guidelines was conducted in June 2023 and repeated in June 2024.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine papers covering thirty-three clinical supervision models and frameworks highlighted conceptual confusion, lack of evidence for informed choices, and a need for balanced clinical supervision to enhance the reflective, critical thinking, and support of nurses transitioning to advanced practice.
CONCLUSION: Further development is needed for clinical supervision models to support nurses transitioning to advanced practice.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: A clearer understanding of clinical supervision within contemporary nursing practice to support nurses' critical reflective thinking for advanced practice.
IMPACT: A clearer understanding of clinical supervision within contemporary nursing practice. Importance of meta-communication skills training for nurses and supervisors. Structured clinical supervision content should be based on nurses' clinical specialty and experience.
REPORTING METHOD: Reporting was guided by The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contributions were included as secondary data was used.
DESIGN: A scoping review guided by JBI methodology for scoping reviews.
METHODS: A systematic search using CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Emcare databases for English-language papers published at any time and ProQuest and Google Scholar databases for unpublished guidelines was conducted in June 2023 and repeated in June 2024.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine papers covering thirty-three clinical supervision models and frameworks highlighted conceptual confusion, lack of evidence for informed choices, and a need for balanced clinical supervision to enhance the reflective, critical thinking, and support of nurses transitioning to advanced practice.
CONCLUSION: Further development is needed for clinical supervision models to support nurses transitioning to advanced practice.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: A clearer understanding of clinical supervision within contemporary nursing practice to support nurses' critical reflective thinking for advanced practice.
IMPACT: A clearer understanding of clinical supervision within contemporary nursing practice. Importance of meta-communication skills training for nurses and supervisors. Structured clinical supervision content should be based on nurses' clinical specialty and experience.
REPORTING METHOD: Reporting was guided by The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contributions were included as secondary data was used.