American journal of clinical pathology · 2006
A direct comparison between lamellar body counts and fluorescent polarization methods for predicting respiratory distress syndrome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haymond Shannon, Luzzi Veronica I, Parvin Curtis A, Gronowski Ann M
Аннотация
Our objective was to directly compare the diagnostic usefulness of lamellar body counting (LBC) and the TDx-FLM II assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) for predicting respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This was a 5-year, retrospective, cohort study. A diagnosis of RDS was given to infants who received surfactant treatment and/or required ventilator support and/or continuous positive airway pressure for more than 24 hours. There were 172 infants without RDS and 12 with RDS included in the study. By using a TDx-FLM II cutoff of 55 mg/g or more for maturity, the sensitivity was 83%, specificity was 65%, predictive value of a mature result was 98%, and predictive value of an immature result was 14%. These results were similar to LBC using a cutoff of 50,000/microL or more with sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 60%, a predictive value of a mature result of 99%, and a predictive value of an immature result of 14%. The LBC and TDx-FLM II methods have similar clinical usefulness.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAmniotic FluidArea Under CurveBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleFluorescence PolarizationGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPulmonary SurfactantsROC CurveReagent Kits, DiagnosticRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRetrospective Studies